Mobile Phone is not a 'Closed Container' Part 2

Mobile Phone is not a 'Closed Container' Part 2

I mentioned in the thread " Mobile Phone is not a 'Closed Container' " that there was more to this disucssion:

http://trewmte.blogspot.com/2010/02/mobile-phone-is-not-closed-container.html

When any digital exhibit produces evidence it is normally presented in a computer document format. The Courts looks at the defendant's behaviour in relation to

Mobile Phone is not a 'Closed Container'

Mobile Phone is not a 'Closed Container'. There has recently been an important judgment in an Ohio Supreme Court that ruled a mobile phone is not covered by the status that a mobile phone is a "closed container" for the purposes of searches; thus mobile phones require a "warrant" prior to searching their (mobile phones') contents. The ruling also refers to the "unique nature of cell phones"...A

Cellular Phones, Warrantless Searches

Cellular Phones, Warrantless Searches.I have just read an interesting paper, published at the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) website on January 18, 2009, which has a very long title:.Cellular Phones, Warrantless Searches, and the New Frontier of Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence..http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1329863#1209265.Written by Matthew E. Orso of the Saint Louis